
Vintage roleta with bichos. Source: Musem of the Policia Civil, Rio de Janeiro
The suspicion is that the content of the exam was leaked to benefit sons, daughters-in-law, sons-in-law and nephews of senior judges of the state court. Among those approved for judgeships by the examination process, seven are related to senior Rio judges.
Lilian Matsuura of Consultor Jurídico (Brazil) reports:
Houve fraude no 41º concurso para ingresso na magistratura feito pelo Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro em 2006. Esta é a conclusão do relator do processo sobre o caso no Conselho Nacional de Justiça, promotor Felipe Locke Cavalcanti. O julgamento, contudo, não terminou porque o conselheiro Técio Lins e Silva pediu vista dos autos.
There was fraud in the 41st competitive entrance examination for the judiciary conducted by the state supreme court of Rio de Janeiro in 2006. That was the conclusion of the investigating magistrate for the National Justice Council (CNJ), prosecutor Felipe Locke Cavalcanti. The case has not concluded yet, however, because CNJ councillor Técio Lins e Silva has requested time to review the case file.
Ao ler seu voto de 51 páginas na sessão nesta terça-feira (26/2), o relator afirmou que houve quebra de sigilo do conteúdo da prova, além de diversas outras irregularidades. Com isso, os 24 juízes aprovados, e que estão trabalhando, correm o risco de ter de deixar os gabinetes. Apesar de constar que o processo não foi lícito, Locke não chegou a uma conclusão em relação ao que deve ser feito. Não conseguiu decidir se todos os aprovados devem perder o cargo ou apenas aqueles que se beneficiaram com a fraude.
Reading out his 51-pp. opinion in the Tuesday session of the CNJ, the investigating magistrate said [the contents of the test leaked out], along with other irregularities. With this, the 24 judges approved, who are already at work, run the risk of having to vacate their offices. Although he found that the process was not valid, Locke did not state a conclusion about what ought to be done about it. He could not manage to decide whether all those approved for judgeships should lose their posts or only those who benefited from the fraud.
The CNJ is an independent oversight body for the Brazilian judiciary, established in recent years.
The irritable Maierovitch, a former federal judge and national “drug czar” turned columnist, has questioned in the past whether the oversight is really all that effective. See
The judiciary has suffered a scandal or two in the last year or so, including two cases from the Rio-São Paulo corridor involving senior judges accused of selling verdicts favoring organized crime interests such as illegal gambling enterprises.
“Legal certainty” seems to have emerged as a major theme at the multilateral donor and credit agencies.
More on that in a minute. The following does tend to leave with the negative impression that some of the judges who might be adjudicating your contract dispute (7 of the 24 candidates approved are related to court members) might be disposed to lie, cheat, steal and otherwise engage in personal conduct not conducive to upholding the fabled majesty of the law in the eyes of its postulants.
As suspeitas eram de quebra de sigilo e fraude para beneficiar filhos, noras, genros e sobrinhos de desembargadores do TJ fluminense. Entre os aprovados no processo, sete têm parentesco com desembargadores.
The suspicion is that the content of the exam was leaked to benefit sons, daughters-in-law, sons-in-law and nephews of senior judges of the state court. Among those approved for judgeships by the examination process, seven are related to senior Rio judges.
Ouch.
Read the rest of this entry »