Governo abre Orçamento da União para ONGs: “The Brazilian government opens up the federal budget to non-governmental organizations” (Terra Magazine).
I am a frequent complainer about the astronomically high ratio of (1) “rhetoric of the technological sublime” press releases to (2) successfully completed acts of accessing actual information, in usable form, on e-government Web sites — both here (Brazil) and there (Brooklyn).
That is why it it is interesting to read this interview with the fellow in charge of improving the situation for the Brazilian executive and legislative branch on behalf of the Brazilian public.
Oh, no, sorry, wait a minute.
The interview is not with the person responsible for implementing existing transparency policy in technical and design terms.
It’s with some Brazilian quango-banger in charge of negotiating a new and improved “equal access” policy.
In which I am less inclined to be interested, personally. It strikes me as a typical postmodern technology sales pitch: Trying to sell you a solution without explaining why the solution you already have is broken or inadequate.
Defining the problem to fit the solution on offer.
But it is still makes an interesting read.
Government transparency, it seems, is governed principally by Law No. 9,507 (1997), which
Regula o direito de acesso a informações e disciplina o rito processual do habeas data.
Legal defines the right to access to information and regulates the legal procedures for “habeas data.”
But that has been supplemented by a number of decrees during Lula I, including a flurry of decrees in 2005 and 2006. You would think a competent backgrounder on the regulatory framework here would summarize those briefly, at the very least.
Besides the government data-publishing programs mentioned in this story, by the way, the CGU — something like the executive-branch OMB in the U.S., with the autonomous para-judicial TCU occupying the adversarial role played by the congressional GAO in our great gringo republic — promotes Olho Vivo no Dinheiro Público (“live eye on public money.)
I have yet to test-drive that.
On the general kinds of things that can go spectacularly wrong when you have fast and loose rules on the management of public data, see, for example, ChoicePoint: Data Brokerage, Election Jokerage? and Fines Levied in That Other ChoicePoint-Facilitated Elections Governance Fubar.
The story is by a fellow named Daniel Bramatti, who was the section editor for the Folha de S. Paulo‘s national (Brasil) section for 12 years before being hired as a “gestor de conteúdos” (content manager) by Bob Fernandes for the e-publication on the Terra internet porta, according to a brief note in the trade press.
Alvo dos mais variados lobbies, controlado por políticos e tecnocratas e alimentado pelo seu bolso, em breve o Orçamento Geral da União poderá ser integralmente fiscalizado por todos os cidadãos com acesso à internet. O governo federal já deu o primeiro passo para submeter o Siafi – sistema informatizado que controla todos os gastos e investimentos federais – ao controle público. No início do mês, um decreto autorizou representantes de ONGs a vistoriar os dados. No futuro próximo, o acesso será universal.
Targeted by various lobbies, controlled by politicos and technocrats and fed by your wallet, the federal budget will soon be fully available to all citizens over the Internet. The federal government has already taken the first step by submitting SIAFI — the IT system that controls all federal expenditures and investments — to public control. At the beginning of [this] month, a decree authorized representatives of NGOs to review the data [what decree?]. In the near future, access will be made universal.
As if the existence of NGOs that are set up specifically for lobbying purposes, and staffed by lobbyists who do nothing but lobby, were somehow unthinkable.
A logical surd, a category mistake, a paradox, a hippogriff, a contravention of the natural order and the laws of physics, like the lion lying down with the lamb.
Give me a freaking break.
This is, after all, the Age of Abramoff. The Age of GONGOs.
And yes, fine, hooray for “universal online access,” but let us not forget the principal argument in the case brought against “paperless justice,” which we clipped early: Hardly anybody in Brazil has a computer.
Also, Brazilian e-government online public information databases, as I have informally surveyed them, are — here comes my usual Jakob Nielsen-inspired carping — a porcaria.
However, since each branch of government has its own standards and practices, it might be worthwhile asking which branch of e-government mounts the worst data access systems, and which has shown signs of improvement and deterioration, as a result of what initatives. Standard Government Computing magazine type of stuff.
See, for example, Brazilian Election Tech: Random Notes.
I keep wanting to know what firm the regional elections tribunal in Alagoas reportedly outsourced its storage, maintenance, and voting-machine prep work to.
I still do not know. And I have actually tried.
Some Brazilian Web sites — in the executive branch, mostly — now sport W3C accessibility credentials, while others have even switched to open-source platforms. See Brazil: Open E-Gov Renaissance?
But on the back end, where the ODBC driver digs into the hard numbers, as far as I can see — and I have not looked systematically, mind you — the song often remains the same:
Exceção de E/S: The Network Adapter could not establish the connection
On to the interview:
Continue reading →
You must be logged in to post a comment.